Dear Wiki user,

You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Jakarta-jmeter Wiki" 
for change notification.

The following page has been changed by JMeterAdmin:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-jmeter/FutureReleases

The comment on the change is:
More items have been fixed

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      * on Windows one can use CON as the file name; /dev/tty for unix - but 
output is not formatted nicely
      * Summariser can already output to console - that may be enough 
   * Restructure HTTP Sampler / Settings GUI. bugzilla 41917. A big job, but is 
becoming necessary, if we are adding more options to the HTTP Sampler
-  * Add a "View only errors" setting in viewers.
-   * Log only errors currently suppresses both the log file (if provided) and 
the GUI display, so I think the following is already possible. I don't think 
there is a need for a separate checkbox, because one can always add a Simple 
Data Writer.
-   * Currently, there is a "Log only errors", but I want to have it as a 
general setting on each listener
-   * This will allow a test plan where you can easily look into samples that 
fails, and get statistics with or without errors (possibly exceptional cases)
-    * a "View Results Tree" is set up to only view errors
-    * a Summary listener which views all samples
-    * a Summary listener only for successes
-    * a Summary listener only for errors
-   * I find the "Write All Data to File" setting on each listener confusing, 
since all listeners share the same possible log output, does it not ?
-    * For example, the "Graph listener", it does not write graph files to the 
file does it ? It writes a CSV or XML file ?
-    * Could we remove the "Write All Data to File" setting from all listeners, 
and instead make a "Write All Data listener" ? [The simple data writer?]
   * Listeners:
    * make distinction between open file for read and write.
      * at present the browse button does both, which is confusing (given the 
heading) <= this has been changed
@@ -81, +70 @@

    * We could get rid of the "HTTP Proxy" settings in the "Webservice(SOAP) 
sampler"
    * Could perhaps just extend HTTP Defaults for this?
    * N.B. HTTP (Java) relies on system properties to define proxy items, so it 
is impossible to have more than one setting.
-  * Make new, nice?, icons for the GUI elements which currently do not have a 
unique icon. For example the post and preprocessors.
+  * Make new, nice?, icons for the GUI elements which currently do not have a 
unique icon. For example the post and preprocessors. <= The Pre and 
Post-Processors now have different icons (corner fold is in a different place)
    * Would make it a lot easier to see what is what in the tree
-  * Make menu options more context sensitive, so they are only enabled when 
they make sense
-   * There seems to be some context sensitivity currently, but the code seems 
a bit odd, with explicit methods used by various parts of the code
   * Extend CSV Data Set to read via JDBC
   * Assertion Results (or similar) could be used to attach errors to samples - 
e.g. if a Post-Processor failed, the error could be shown there instead of in 
the log. Or just add string array for storing such errors?
   * Improve Http``Mirror``Thread class - done, but not submitted (Alf Hogemark)
@@ -119, +106 @@

    * Or perhaps SL4J - http://www.slf4j.org/
    * What are the risks with continuing to use Avalon, if Avalon is not 
maintained anymore ?
    * Remark: Http``Components project is considering migrating Http``Client 
4.0 branch off Commons Logging to another logging framework as Commons Logging 
currently appears unmaintained and the prospects of its further development 
remain unclear. [Does it need any development? sebb] It may be worthwhile to 
ensure both projects use the same logging framework / compatible logging 
frameworks. [Agreed: sebb]
-  * Upgrade to httpclient4 ? httpclient4 is still only in Alpha. Should / 
could we have one sampler class using httpclient3 and one httpclient4 ?
+  * Upgrade to httpclient4 ? httpclient4 is still only in Alpha. Should / 
could we have one sampler class using httpclient3 and one httpclient4 ? 
HttpClient 4 will require Java 1.5, and won't be available until Q2/Q3 2008.
   * Reorganise documentation
    * component_reference is getting much too big. This will require changes to 
the help system.
    * sort functions and component ref into more logical order (currently 
chronological)
@@ -137, +124 @@

    * would be nice to be able to enable/disable fields depending on what else 
is selected - e.g. JDBC parameters only needed for prepared statements
    * ensure drop-down list size big enough for all entries (within limits!)
   * move from Bugzilla to JIRA? More flexible, (but attachments a bit more 
awkward at present?)
-  * Change control logic so it does not use Exceptions for normal situations
   * Can we add Beanshell jar to the distribution? If so, then some BeanShell 
elements could be simplified. License is either SPL or LGPL, but versions are 
not stated; not clear if allowed.
    * According to http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html, we can include 
libraries in binary form if licensed under SPL
    * The http://www.beanshell.org/license.html states it is dual licensed 
under SPL/LGPL
@@ -198, +184 @@

    * Host   Port
    * Path
    * Encoding
+  * Change control logic so it does not use Exceptions for normal situations - 
NextIsNull is only thrown by GenericController if it has no children. Also used 
by Interleave Controller.
+  * Add a "View only errors" setting in viewers.
+   * Log only errors currently suppresses both the log file (if provided) and 
the GUI display, so I think the following is already possible. I don't think 
there is a need for a separate checkbox, because one can always add a Simple 
Data Writer.
+   * Currently, there is a "Log only errors", but I want to have it as a 
general setting on each listener
+   * This will allow a test plan where you can easily look into samples that 
fails, and get statistics with or without errors (possibly exceptional cases)
+    * a "View Results Tree" is set up to only view errors
+    * a Summary listener which views all samples
+    * a Summary listener only for successes
+    * a Summary listener only for errors
+   * I find the "Write All Data to File" setting on each listener confusing, 
since all listeners share the same possible log output, does it not ?
+    * For example, the "Graph listener", it does not write graph files to the 
file does it ? It writes a CSV or XML file ?
+    * Could we remove the "Write All Data to File" setting from all listeners, 
and instead make a "Write All Data listener" ? [The simple data writer?]
+  * Make menu options more context sensitive, so they are only enabled when 
they make sense
+   * There seems to be some context sensitivity currently, but the code seems 
a bit odd, with explicit methods used by various parts of the code (now fixed)
  

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to