On 26/02/2010, James Pharaoh <ja...@phsys.co.uk> wrote: > 2010/2/26 sebb <seb...@gmail.com>: > > > On 26/02/2010, James Pharaoh <ja...@phsys.co.uk> wrote: > > >> I notice both these scripting facilities seem to recompile the script > >> every time they are used. I'm pretty sure this shouldn't be necessary > >> and that the performance could be increased significantly by compiling > >> once. Does anyone know any good reason this is not done? > > Because one would have to keep track of whether the script changed > > during the test run, e.g. because the GUI used variable or function > > references. Or indeed another script might change the script file > > (unlikely, but there might be a use case for this). > > > So in this case you could store scripts based on the hash code of the > string, or the timestamp and/or hash code of the file. There could > even be an option to always recompile, always reuse or always check.
Patches welcome; please use Bugzilla to raise an enhancement request and attach the patches to that. > > James > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-dev-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-dev-h...@jakarta.apache.org
