> And yet another advantage of a generator: it's probably easier > to write, since you don't have to worry about all this stuff. > You only have to figure out how to create test-plan elements and > insert them into the list -- probably far easier than grokking > the fullness of the test-runner machinery...
To do that I would need an element per request path (e.g. 1 for /index.html, 1 for /images/image1.jpg, etc....), right? First problem: there will be thousands of different request paths in these logs, all for perfectly valid URLs, and I doubt that creating thousands of different element in the test plan is a viable option. Second problem: Some of these request get called repeatedly, but not in any predictable manner, and these calls are all randomly ordered and interspersed. I doubt any logic controller that could be written to handle this would be at all easy. Jason
