Has anyone tried using the jrocket jvm with jmeter?  It has concurrent gc features.

 -----Original Message-----
From:   Vishal Mehra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent:   Wednesday, September 03, 2003 9:31 AM
To:     JMeter Users List
Subject:        Re: Memory / CPU usage

Try this. In the jmeter startup script where it starts the java process,
add -Xmx128m -Xms128m

This will give the java process some help in memory management as it 
will have 128m of heap instead of the default 64m.

Regards,
Vishal.

peter lin wrote:
>  
> I'm not sure it's JMeter's fault. I've compared apache bench to JMeter. When I use 
> AB to load test a jsp on a 2Ghz AMD box with 1gig of ram, anything more than 75 
> users yield unreliable results. AB definitely uses less memory, but over 50 users on 
> a system with just one ethernet is going to be limited by network I/O. It's usually 
> better to load up a couple of systems with 25-50 users.
>  
> I should qualify what I mean by unreliable. Basically the variance/deviation between 
> requests was considerably higher. In many case I had to use AB with keep alive to 
> get reliable results. Without using keep alive, the total time between each run 
> would vary dramatically. If I ran a large number of tests and averaged the results, 
> it yielded better results, but takes a lot more time.
>  
> peter
>  
> 
> 
> Duncan Frostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's Java for you. As great as the portability and libs are, it's such
> a painfully slow lang for performance tasks. I have a Solaris server 
> with 2GB of RAM and it can't do 100 threads without giving me stupidly
> high response times (of close to an hour...) on some requests.
> 
> Its a pity because JMeter is such a fantastically good tool when it 
> works, its just let down by performance issues. If you want to load test
> at anything like a high load with JMeter you need several high powered
> servers doing it in unision to spread the threads.
> 
> I was trying to use the GCJ compiler - which claims to compile java 
> bytecode to machine code - to increase performance but I couldn't get it
> working, that could be a possible performance boost. My general rule of
> thumb is that for anything above 75 users JMeter/Java is too resource 
> hungry to give accurate results on my hardware.
> 
> And now I'm trying high-loads, thats a problem. However, IBM have a 
> nifty if hard to configure tool called 'stress'. It's written in C so it
> performs very well, just lacks a lot of JMeters great functionality. You
> can find it online if you serach for IBM Web Performance Tools.
> 
> Perhaps a port of JMeter to C++ should be considered? I know this would
> involve doing a lot of painfully boring networking and threading code 
> but the performance gain would be huge.
> 
> Cheers, Duncan
> 
> 
> Mark McWhinney wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi all,
>>
>>I am a long time LoadRunner user but am new to JMeter. I am impressed with
>>its functionality. It is a lot closer to LoadRunner than many of us in the
>>LoadRunner community realize.
>>
>>I am going through the usual newbie issues but am actually reading the
>>manual and figuring it out.
>>
>>I ran a test with one thread group with 30 threads that had six HTTP
>>requests with a 5 second wait time between each request. I maxed out the
>>CPU at about 20 to 25 users on a 800 MHz Windows 2000 machine. Memory
>>utilization was about 350 Mbytes. Is that typical? I am really going to
>>need 10 machines to do a 250 user load test or am I missing something?
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to