>I will work on changing the size of the text field. >have you tried using an external file? in my own >tests, when the messages were large, it was easier for >me to use an external file.
Sounds like a good idea. >you're right about catching errors, like blank host >and port. I don't what would be the best way to handle >it. Do you have any thoughts as to how you feel it >should work? What about the way an invalid Soap message is handled Try changing a working soap message and then running the test >I actually haven't tried command line with the >webservices sampler. I've only used GUI mode. Are you >still getting double requests? I know without using >proxies, the request works correct (ie not double). if >you tell me more, I will look into it and try to find >a gix. By command line I mean when you start Jmeter there are command line arguments to specify the proxy -H and port -P I think you should perhaps pick these up as defaults or just use them and have no entry fields in the sampler. No I am not getting double. The Loop count was set to 2 peter --- Peter Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Initially I just ran the test and it didn't work. I > was assuming you would be picking the proxy > parameters up off the command line. I was half way > through an email to you about it still not working > when I found the proxy entry fields (they were > blank). Originally it was scrolled off the bottom of > the window. > > On reflection perhaps you are picking up the command > line and just not showing it initially. After I > entered the values they were always there on other > tests I loaded (this is good). > > It is useful to have the check box to enable/disable > proxy. However the values should come off the > command line if they are there. > > The UI needs to maximise the space for the Soap > Request message, width and depth. These could get > rather large. > > The system lets me check use proxy and not put in an > entry. There is no error generated for this. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > org]On Behalf Of peter lin > Sent: Monday, 12 January 2004 09:48 > To: JMeter Users List > Subject: RE: Web Services Question > > > > Hi peter, > > > I'm glad that worked for you. I will clean it up a > bit. A couple quick questions regarding the UI. > > did it make sense to you that you have to check "use > proxy" to enable it? Or would it make more sense to > have it enabled always? > > any other thoughts you have about the UI is greatly > appreciated. > > peter > > > --- Peter Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have downloaded 20040111 and it works - Yahoo!! > > > > Thank you for your help. > > > > I am happy to test any other changes you may want > to > > make in the future. > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > org]On Behalf Of peter lin > > Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 17:02 > > To: JMeter Users List > > Subject: RE: Web Services Question > > > > > > > > I've checked in the changes to the sampler for > proxy > > support. I didn't fix the width issue yet. > > unfortunately, I don't know the textfield well > > enough > > to set the width correctly. I gave it a quick try, > > but > > wasn't able to. > > > > I'll fix that later, once I find out from one of > the > > other developers. please get the latest nightly > and > > give it a try. > > > > peter lin > > > > --- Peter Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Perhaps you could make the WSDL URL, Web Methods > > > drop down, URL, SOAPAction and "Soap/XML-RPC > Data" > > > dialog box full screen width for improved > > > readability. > > > > > > I am happy to test all changes. > > > > > > I anticipate many hours for this projected. > Jmeter > > > will be the load and regression testing tool. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > org]On Behalf Of peter lin > > > Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 09:16 > > > To: JMeter Users List > > > Subject: RE: Web Services Question > > > > > > > > > > > > eeek, that sounds aweful. I'm sorry you have no > > > choice. I'll make the change tomorrow and check > it > > > in over the weekend. when I'm ready, I'll send > you > > > an email. I don't use proxy's, so I will need > > your > > > help to test it out. > > > > > > how does that sound? > > > > > > > > > peter lin > > > > > > > > > Peter Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The issue is not that the Web Service uses the > > > proxy, the company I am working in mandates a > > proxy > > > for all external traffic with Novel Border > > > protection etc etc. This will often be the case. > > > > > > We have yet to establish an internal Web > Service. > > As > > > such, in this environment, I cannot avoid the > > proxy > > > for external Web Services, and so cannot prove > it > > is > > > the proxy causing the problem. However it looks > > 99% > > > certain to be that. > > > > > > Could you please implement the change, including > > the > > > command line proxy parameters, thus making it > > > optional. > > > > > > I appreciate your help with this. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > org]On Behalf Of peter lin > > > Sent: Friday, 9 January 2004 02:48 > > > To: JMeter Users List > > > Subject: RE: Web Services Question > > > > > > > > > > > > The current implementation is pretty simple. For > > the > > > wsdl url, I use the standard JMeter connection > > > classes, so proxies do not affect it. The actual > > > call using apache soap currently doesn't account > > for > > > proxy. My reasoning (probably flawed) is a > > > webservice shouldn't be using a proxy, since it > > > would pose a security risk. I may be a bit > > paranoid > > > here, but the webservices I've worked on need to > > be > > > secure. My personal bias is proxy servers can > log > > > traffic and I don't trust them. Of course, if > you > === message truncated === __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/signingbonus --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of this communication or disclose anything about it. Thank you. Please note that this communication does not designate an information system for the purposes of the Electronic Transactions Act 2002." ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
