Hello,

I don't think, scripting is a good choice. Last year I used Tcl scripts for creating JMX, this year I'd have to write new scripts. File format changes.

I'm neither convinced of the "evil suggestion". It's not intuitive. It's reusing features build for other purposes. It can't reconstruct the change between HTTP and HTTPS. And and and...

If I find time, I'll do my homework, present a ready patch and ask again.

Felix

BAZLEY, Sebastian wrote:
Or - continuing the theme - use a scripting language to create the JMX file.

This becomes a lot easier with the work that Mike has done on using Xstream
for parsing the file, as the JMX file format is now a lot simpler.

S.
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Stover [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 23 June 2004 15:26
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: importing linklists


Evil suggestion:

Use the current AccessLogSampler on the list of urls (may need a new
parser implementation, depending on format of list).

Run two instances of JMeter.  One instance has a recording proxy server
on.  The other instance is started up to USE that proxy server.  This
second instance runs the AccessLogSampler against the file.  The samples
will then be recorded in the JMeter running the proxy server.

-Mike

On Wed, 2004-06-23 at 10:09, Peter Lin wrote:

ok, I think I understand now. To paraphrase.

1. import in URL via some mechanism
2. manually change the threadgroup to simulate user session
3. run test


it sounds like you would like a better solution to 1 and 2 using some sort of import. correct me if I'm wrong. the feature you are looking for is something like this.

1. a file of URL's with multiple sets of request parameters
2. use a new plugin to import the file
3. the plugin generates a thread group with n HttpSamplers matching
exactly the same number of parameter sets in each line. Like say each
line does login, search and logout. the import would create three
HttpSamplers with the correct parameters in each.
4. run your test plan.

Is that an accurate interpretation?

peter


On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:54:53 +0200, Felix van Hove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Hello Peter,

thanks for the reply. I definitly should have a closer look at the

access log

sampler. Let me explain further, what I would like to get by an import

feature.

If I get individual samplers by importing a list of (HTTP-) addresses, I

can

configure requests much more precisely. In my case I need to simulate

half a

dozen different users, who are subscribing to newsletters, login,

logout,

ordering products, registering etc. I need to url-rewrite nearly every

request,

iterating over productlists, address-lists, accounts etc. The import

itself is

only the first step in building the test plan for me.

If I am not focussing on server logfiles, I may also switch between

different

protocols, samplers, even server instances. I had the idea of stress

testing a

server by a combination of webservices- and user-requests; first I'd

have to

import SOAP requests and the usual HTTP requests, afterwards combining

them to a

complex test plan. Ok, I'm not sure, if such a scenario makes sense at

all;-)

And last but not least a practical reason: As a customer, whishing

someone to

check my site, I would copy-paste URLs from the address line of my

browser to a

file. I actually got my linklist as a power point presentation :-)

Felix



Peter Lin wrote:

Mike recently made a lot of nice changes to AccessLogSampler.
Probably the easiest way is to write a parser that implements the
parser interface. then you can simply drop the jar file into /lib/
directory to use it with the AccessLogSampler.

the original idea behind the accesslog sampler was to use production
access logs for simulating loads and running simulations.  This is
particularly useful if there's a bug that appears under very specific
situations. Say you discover a bug in a webapp, so you stress test it.
The bug doesn't appear with randomly generated requests.

in cases like these from my own experience, it is the result of usage
patterns, which random requests can not reproduce.  the accesslog also
lets me compare one system to another and make apples-to-apples
comparison. well as close to apples-to-apples as possible.  if you
need help implementing the parser interface, just post a message and
I'll try to explain it to the best of my ability.

peter


On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:53:08 +0200, Felix van Hove <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I just started to prepare a jmeter add-on to import request lists,
using each request parsed from the list to create a sampler suiting
the protocol. But may be I'm overlooking an allready existing feature?
(As far as I can see, the access log parser has a much more
specialised - and different - idea.)

Until now I'm focussing on linklists / clickstreams. The import parses
a list of links (seperated by linefeeds) and creates a HTTP sampler
(as a child of the current node) for each of them. It's taking care
for preserving the protocol (which only can be HTTP and HTTPS until
now), server name, port number, path and parameters (using
HtmlParsingUtils.createUrlFromAnchor()).

Background: I had to build a test plan by 79 requests, the clickstream
file has 13792 characters, http parameters everywhere. Especially to
paste parameters is extremly error-prone.

I inserted this import function as a menu point in the file menu, -
it's just opening a file-open dialog.

Is there allready a better way for doing this?

--
easynet GmbH (http://www.de.easynet.net)
Felix van Hove, system integration
Harburger Schlossstrasse 1, D-21079 Hamburg
fon: +49-40-77175-457, fax: +49-40-77175-498
# easynet is part of the easynet group plc (www.easynetgroup.net)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- easynet GmbH (http://www.de.easynet.net) Felix van Hove, system integration Harburger Schlossstrasse 1, D-21079 Hamburg fon: +49-40-77175-457, fax: +49-40-77175-498 # easynet is part of the easynet group plc (www.easynetgroup.net)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

-- easynet GmbH (http://www.de.easynet.net) Felix van Hove, system integration Harburger Schlossstrasse 1, D-21079 Hamburg fon: +49-40-77175-457, fax: +49-40-77175-498 # easynet is part of the easynet group plc (www.easynetgroup.net)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to