Did you mean "random # = thread #"?

JJ

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Darretta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 10:29 AM
To: JMeter Users List
Subject: Re: Pseudo-Interleave Controller Question

Well, I've found my own answer. I use the __Random function prior to 
each request group, and only issue the request if the randomly generated

sequence number == the group number.

Mike

Mike Darretta wrote:

> My test contains a number of HTTP requests to modify page 
> configurations. I would like a pattern that would allow each thread to

> either randomly or in some orderly way select a different
configuration 
> request, independent of other threads.
> 
> I thought the Interleave Controller would solve this issue, but it 
> appears to only control requests per iteration, not per thread.
> 
> So, instead of :
> 
> Loop1
> Thread 1 -> execute request 1
> Thread 2 -> execute request 1
> Thread 3 -> execute request 1
> 
> Loop2
> Thread 1 -> execute request 2
> Thread 2 -> execute request 2
> Thread 3 -> execute request 2
> 
> etc...
> 
> I would like:
> 
> Loop1
> Thread 1 -> execute request 1
> Thread 2 -> execute request 2
> Thread 3 -> execute request 3
> 
> Loop1
> Thread 1 -> execute request 2
> Thread 2 -> execute request 3
> Thread 3 -> execute request 1
> 
> etc...
> 
> The only way I can see doing this is to create separate ThreadGroups
for 
> each thread in question. This is not practical, since I plan on
running 
> for over 100 threads.
> 
> Any thoughts?
> 
> Thanks,
> Mike
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to