Can u be more precise.
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:47:53 +0530, Deepak Batra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It actually seems to have a negative impact too, that thread ends right > away. > > On more testing if I don't set the > > group.setScheduler(true); > > and hence don't get into the following code (in my > NewStandardJMeterEngine that extends StandardJMeterEngine) > > thread.setEndTime(group.getDuration()*1000+(thread.getStartTime())); > > then test takes the values from the .jmx file and runs as per those > properties. > > Deepak > > Deepak Batra wrote: > > > thread.setEndTime(group.getDuration()*1000+(thread.getStartTime())); > > doesn't seem to have any impact. I have a controller that sets this > > duration but my test just ignores this values and starts and ends > > right away. > > > > Can someone guide what I am doing wrong. > > > > Deepak > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
