OK. Do all variables get written to this? Might be expensive (access will have to be synchronized). If not, how are the variables chosen? Naming convention perhaps? Otherwise a new syntax might be needed.
S. On 4/27/05, Michael Stover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So why don't we just slap another JMeterVariables object in the > JMeterContextService class that can act as a holder for global > variables? Each context has a getVariables method that retrieves the > variable holder for each thread, let's make a global one too. > > -Mike > > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 14:18 +0100, sebb wrote: > > Variables are local to a thread. > > > > Properties are global to JMeter; they can easily be read using the > > various property functions. > > > > However, at present the only way to set them is to use BeanShell, but > > it would not be difficult to enhance JMeter to add a function or some > > other test element to set a property from a variable. > > > > S. > > On 4/27/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I recall a similar issue (relating to thread synchronisation) that was > > > discussed recently but I can't for the life of me find the e-mails, so > > > please forgive me if this is rehashing something that's already been > > > addressed. > > > > > > Here is what I am trying to accomplish in JMeter: I want to have two > > > thread groups. One thread group would contain a given testplan and the > > > second would contain another simple testplan that simply loops through a > > > couple requests for as long as the first thread group is running. > > > > > > My first thought was to declare a user variable that I would use as the > > > condition for a Loop Controller in the second thread group. When the first > > > thread group finishes, it would set the value of this variable to false > > > and the loop in the second thread group would exit. This does not appear > > > to work. > > > > > > So I guess my question is: is there a way to declare a variable that is > > > global to the whole testplan? and moreover, is there a better way to have > > > my two thread groups interact in a way that would accomplish what I am > > > trying to do? > > > > > > Thanks in advance for any insight you might have, > > > Vincent > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
