Yes, that would be the normal process. -Mike
On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 10:46 -0400, Chad La Joie wrote: > Great! Thanks Mike. > > I also ran across a bug this morning dealing with copying and pasting. > Is your normal process to just submit that through bugzilla? > > Michael Stover wrote: > > I just added (CVS Head) this to the HTTP Defaults Config so that you can > > control the behavior of multiple http samplers from one place. > > > > -Mike > > > > On Wed, 2005-05-25 at 08:33 -0400, Chad La Joie wrote: > > > >>There is a default, not doing it, the feature request is the ability to > >>change that default within a larger scope. > >> > >>I'm not trying to debate the merits of hosting images on separate > >>servers. In the application I'm currently testing, no matter how much > >>traffic it ever gets the images won't be hosted on another server > >>because the product vendor isn't going to do that. > >> > >>I'm just trying to point out that in the two applications I'm currently > >>testing, having such a feature would be nice. And, as far as I can > >>tell, there isn't any technical reason not to do it. > >> > >>Peter Lin wrote: > >> > >>>to my knowledge, there isn't a default. I would advise against making > >>>all the HTTP sampler get the embedded resource. I mainly work on > >>>large sites and performance is usually a hard requirement. The > >>>applications that I've worked on first hand used a dedicated image > >>>server. In fact, if you look at any website that supports moderate to > >>>heavy load, all the images are served off a dedicated image server. > >>> > >>>hosting the images on a dedicated server will easily improve the > >>>performance of a website by 2-3x depending on how many images each > >>>page has. the more images a page has, the greater the performance > >>>improvement. > >>> > >>>hope that helps > >>> > >>>peter > >>> > >>> > >>>On 5/25/05, Chad La Joie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>Yep, I saw the check box, and I do check it. My thinking was that > >>>>instead of having to check that box for each request (and we have a fair > >>>>number of them in our test plans) it would be nice if I could have that > >>>>be the default behavior, either because it was the default behavior for > >>>>the HTTP sampler, or because I was able to set on the HTTP request > >>>>defaults. > >>>> > >>>>Peter Lin wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/component_reference.html#HTTP_Request > >>>>> > >>>>>if you look at the Http request, you should see "retrieve all embedded > >>>>>resource". if you check that, Jmeter will retrieve all the images. > >>>>>Keep in mind that most users are not going to download all the images > >>>>>on every single page. Any image that has already been downloaded and > >>>>>cached in the browser won't be re-downloaded. the exception to this > >>>>>case is when a user explicitly sets the browser to always retrieve > >>>>>every image. > >>>>> > >>>>>I'm assuming there's access logs from production. What I tend to do is > >>>>>look at the log report and figure out the ratio of images to pages. > >>>>>this way, you get closer to simulating real traffic conditions. > >>>>> > >>>>>peter > >>>>> > >>>>>On 5/25/05, Chad La Joie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>When load testing web applications you generally want to simulate, as > >>>>>>closely as possible, what would happen if a real user was doing their > >>>>>>thing. So, for us, that means that for each HTTP request we want it to > >>>>>>retrieve all the resources for that page as well. It seems like this > >>>>>>might be a very common thing, perhaps even the normal behavior people > >>>>>>wanted. So I was wondering if either the default behavior of the HTTP > >>>>>>Request sampler could be to fetch those things, or in a more > >>>>>>configurable manner, if there could be an option of the Http Request > >>>>>>Defaults config element to set this. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Just a thought. > >>>>>>-- > >>>>>>Chad La Joie 315Q St. Mary's Hall > >>>>>>Project Sentinel 202.687.0124 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>Chad La Joie 315Q St. Mary's Hall > >>>>Project Sentinel 202.687.0124 > >>>> > >>>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
