Which version of Jmeter are you using? I don't understand what's happening here.
Try replacing your HTTP Sampler with a JavaTest sampler to see if the timings are affected by the presence of the user parameter pre-processor or not. Or indeed try using the standard HTTP Sampler instead of yours. If either of these shows the timing problem, please create a Bugzilla issue, and then attach the following: - simple test script that has OK timing data - simple test script that causes timing data problems - jmeter.log for both test runs - jtl files for both runs. S. P.S. If you thing the changes you made to the HTTP Sampler might be useful to others, perhaps you would consider filing a Bugzilla enhancement request to describe what you have added. On 7/1/05, Rabi Lahiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have the duration assertion as a child of the sampler. > > Something interesting I noticed just now, though - if I use static > arguments and no User parameter preprocessor with the sampler, the > timing data looks fine. If I add the user parameter preprocessor with > two $_StringFromFile functions (as a child of the sampler), the timing > data gets messed up and looks cumulative among all the threads, even > if I don't actually use the variables from the file (i.e. I leave the > arguments to the sampler as static data). > > Could the thread timers be including the time that each thread is > blocked on I/O or somehow accumulating time because of that? We have > subclassed the HTTPSampler and AbstractSamplerGui for our project; > otherwise everything is from the standard distribution. > > thanks again, > Rabi > > On 6/30/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Where have you put the duration assertions in relation to the samplers? > > > > Which version of JMeter are you using? > > > > S > > On 6/30/05, Rabi Lahiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I've looked through all the docs I could find and the mail archives > > > and couldn't find an answer to this. I have a subclass of HTTPSampler > > > and need to implement timeouts for my requests. I'm using the sampler > > > with the following setup: > > > > > > 500 threads > > > 1 loop > > > parameter "args" is _StringFromFile(args.txt) > > > parameter "method" is _StringFromFile(methods.txt) > > > > > > My service needs to pass args and method dynamically this way. > > > args.txt and methods.txt are 500-line files which constitute the > > > requests I need. This works fine and I can test the results of each > > > with response assertions, except that duration assertions don't work > > > properly. The duration assertion appears to be timing the whole set > > > of 500 threads instead of each one individually, so as soon as the > > > group time hits the assertion value every thread fails. For example, > > > let's say each call takes exactly 200 ms. If I set the duration > > > assertion to 1100ms, the first five responses succeed but all the rest > > > fail. I need to be able to set it up so that I can verify that no > > > individual call takes more than, say, 250ms. Is this possible? If I > > > need to make a code change, can it be done relatively simply? > > > > > > thanks, > > > Rabi Lahiri > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
