If you write a sampler that sends a request and blocks/waits until it receives a reply via a separate socket, then that sampler could report how long it took to receive the asynch response and the sampler would behave just like any other sampler as far as JMeter is concerned.
-Mike On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 17:26 +0530, Vinod Panicker wrote: > On 8/11/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not convinced that you need separate threads to run this test. > > > > If you want to send a message on one connection, and then wait until a > > message arrives on another connection, then it seems to me that these > > can be in the same thread. > > Any pointers on how this can be achieved or should I RTFM? Its not > necessary that the two connections are independent execution units. I > could make do with just one thread. > > Regards, > Vinod. > > > On 11/08/05, Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 8/10/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I don't think that is possible in jmeter. The threads are independent > > > > of each other and do not thread.join(thread) to the best of my > > > > knowledge. > > > > > > But this kind of functional testing becomes essential when trying to > > > test asynchronous non-request-response based protocols. Any idea if > > > support for this is planned? > > > > > > > On 8/10/05, Vinod Panicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Let me explain in more detail. > > > > > > > > > > There are two threads, X and Y. Both run simultaneously to reach > > > > > checkpoint A. X sends a request to the server which is sent to Y. X > > > > > needs to know that Y received what was sent. > > > > > > > > > > To implement the above I was asking for something like dependency > > > > > configuration / join implementation. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > Vinod. > > > > > > > > > > On 8/10/05, Christian Baumgartner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Am I right that you want to run both Threads at the same time, but > > > > > > one > > > > > > should wait for the other finishing? > > > > > > > > > > > > If you click TestPlan there is an Option that runs ThreadsGroups > > > > > > one after > > > > > > another. But maybe it's more practicable to manage it with the > > > > > > Controllers > > > > > > and Timers. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > > > > > > Von: Vinod Panicker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. August 2005 10:09 > > > > > > An: [email protected] > > > > > > Betreff: Dependency support for threads > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Is there any way by which I can specify that Thread x needs to wait > > > > > > till > > > > > > Thread y completes successfully? > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm trying to test an asynchronous TCP based IM protocol. So I > > > > > > want to be > > > > > > able to test if a message sent by x reached y. x and y will be > > > > > > independent > > > > > > sessions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Vinod. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
