Hi,

I am trying to set up remote testing using a different port than 1099
for rmi.

I've started rmiregistry on the client nodes on a different port (13715)
by modifying bin/jmeter-server, and instructed the controller to connect
on that port by means of server_port in jmeter.properties.

However, tcpdump shows the controller trying to communicate on port 1099
still.

Is server_port in jmeter.properties not the correct file to be using?
I've tried setting server.rmi.port to 13715 as well, to no avail.

Thanks,

Ollie


jmeter-server diff on the client nodes
--------------------------------------
  $ diff -U1 jmeter-server jmeter-server.new
  --- jmeter-server       2005-09-29 22:06:08.000000000 +0000
  +++ jmeter-server.new   2005-11-21 15:24:40.000000000 +0000
  @@ -21,3 +21,3 @@
   export CLASSPATH
  -rmiregistry &
  +rmiregistry 13715 &
   set CLASSPATH=$OLDCLASSPATH

jmeter.properties diff on the controller node
---------------------------------------------
  $ diff -U1 jmeter.properties jmeter.properties.new 
  --- jmeter.properties   2005-09-23 00:10:21.000000000 +0100
  +++ jmeter.properties.new       2005-11-21 15:26:16.000000000 +0000
  @@ -87,3 +87,3 @@
   # Remote Hosts - comma delimited
  -remote_hosts=127.0.0.1
  +remote_hosts=127.0.0.1,bert.dev.uk.betfair
   #remote_hosts:localhost:1099,localhost:2010
  @@ -91,3 +91,3 @@
   # RMI port to be used by the server
  -#server_port=1099
  +server_port=13715
 
  @@ -358,3 +358,3 @@
   # Change default port used by server (need to start rmiregistry with
same port)
  -#server.rmi.port=1099
  +server.rmi.port=13715

tcpdump showing connection on 1099/tcp with above configs
---------------------------------------------------------
  15:15:26.788354 mutare.32921 > bert.dev.uk.betfair.1099: S
3349072793:3349072793(0) win 5840 <mss 1460,sackOK,timestamp 615613839
0,nop,wscale 2> (DF)

-- 
Ollie Cook
UNIX Scripter
Information Systems


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to