Unless there is also a sampler in the Logic controller ... but point taken; the documentation is misleading.
S. On 28/11/05, Bruno Charloup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There is a problem in the JMeter document, in the section 18.6 about Timers. > It is written " ... To apply a timer after a sampler, either add it to the > next sampler, or add it as the child of a simple logic controller > immediately after the sampler." > Only the 1st proposition works, and it works fine. > > > -----Message d'origine----- > De : sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : vendredi 25 novembre 2005 18:27 > À : JMeter Users List > Objet : Re: Timer > > On 24/11/05, Christian Sterzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello > > > > I have problems using timer. > > > > In my Application I need to need measure response time of a certain > > transaction called T (5 Transactions) when 100 user are logged in. T > > should be started by 50 Users in a Minute (T starts when T1 is called. > > I have to measure response times of T1 to T5). So I made following test > plan: > > > > Counter > > Thread Group (100/100 ramp-up/1) > > ---HTTP Request(Load LoginPage) > > ---HTTP Request(Login) > > ---IF Counter>50 > > ------Simple Controller > > ---------Synchronizing Timer(50) > > > ------HTTP Request(T1) > > ---------Constant Throughput Timer(50/all active threads) ------HTTP > > Request(T2) ------HTTP Request(T3) ------HTTP Request(T4) ------HTTP > > Request(T5) ---HTTP Request(Logout) ------Synchronizing Timer(100) > > > > If all 50 Users made T, every User should log out. > > > > It's like my First Synchronizing Timer got ignored. Particular it > > runs, that the > > Config items, Timers, Pre- and Post-Processors are only executed when a > sampler is processed. > > > first 50 Users are logging in and logging out the next moment. All > > after coming users are going through T1 to T5. But those users are > > never logging out, cause they are not getting 100. > > > > Does anyone have experience of a similiar test. Instead of the > > constant throughput timer, a constant timer is also possible, if i can > > say for every thread wait a second, before going the next thread into > > request T1. But i'm getting really headache of this synch timer. > > > > regards > > > > chris > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
