I've added some code to the HttpClient Sampler which hopefully handles gzip decompression. Not been able to test it.
If you want to try it, the nightly build 2-1.20051210 contains the update. S. On 09/12/05, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe it also supports NTLM authentication even when running on > non-Windows hosts. > > It's a lot more configurable. Adding slow connections to the default > implementation is hard work. The Apache implementation has proper > Cookie handling (though we aren't using that yet). It also has highly > configurable logging, should that be needed. > > However, there are some features of the original HttpSampler that have > not yet been implemented in the new sampler. We're trying to add them > as problems arise, but day jobs and other commitments can get in the > way... > > If there are features which don't yet work in the Apache Http Sampler, > please feel free to create a Bugzilla issue. Test cases are a help. > Patches even better... > > S. > On 09/12/05, Peter Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the advantage of the HTTPClient version is it supports keep alive and slow > > connections correctly. the default sun implementation does not and hasn't > > since the beginning. > > > > peter > > > > > > On 12/9/05, Christensen, Alan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I originally wrote all my scripts using the "HTTP Request" sampler. Now > > > there is a second one that is called "HTTP Request HTTPClient". What is > > > the advantage of using one vs the other? > > > > > > So far the "HTTP Request" sampler has worked well for my tests except > > > that the line speed property cannot be used with this sampler. > > > > > > The "HTTP Request HTTPClient" sampler does work with the line speed > > > property but the current version in the December 7th nightly build > > > doesn't seem to work with https (parameter issue?) and doesn't > > > decompress pages that were requested with compression enabled. Hence > > > all assertions fail. These issues would seem to make this new sampler > > > not worth using unless you must take advantage of the line speed > > > property. Are there any advantages of this sampler that I don't know > > > about? Why was it developed? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
