honestly, I don't know the answer to that, but I'll take a guess.

In request only mode, ActiveMQ is probably returning a response immediately,
then queueing up the message. In could be that in that case, it batches the
insert, so there could be a longer delay. In contrast, request response has
a longer elapsed time from the thread perspective but shorter time from
postgresql.

I would ask the activeMQ guys to get a definitive answer. James Strachan is
usually good about providing a good explanation.

peter


On 12/12/05, Kim Loh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Based on Point-To-Point Sampler in JMeter,
>
> 1.      For Communication Style drop list, May I know the difference
> between
> Request Only and Request Response?
>
> 2.      From JMeter Log, the results obtained from above two options are
> below:
> Why there is the difference elapsed time sending message to postgresql
> database between these two methods which the Request Only slower than the
> request response using the same message via JMS ActiveMQ provider.
>
> Communication Style: Request Response
> -------------------------------------
> Thread Started  : 16:42:13
> Thread Done             : 16:42:18
>
> ==> TimeStamp in Postgresql: 16.42.15
>
>
> Communication Style: Request Only
> -------------------------------------
> Thread Started  : 16:17:24
> Thread Done             : 16:17:24
>
> ==> TimeStamp in Postgresql: 16.17:49
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Kim
>
>

Reply via email to