is the goal to simulate concurrent load?

if so, the proper way to do it is to gradually ramp up and then keep the
load at a set level. Once the steady state is reached, take the desired
measurements on the server.

from the description, it's not clear what the goal is.

peter


On 2/18/06, Tan, Kwei Fang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Need help and guideline on how to get the "started" time consistent for
> 500 concurrent hits with the following setting:
>
>
>
> Thread Group Setting
>
> Number of Threads: 500
>
> ramp-up period: 0
>
> loop count:1
>
>
>
> CSV Data Set config
>
> -          set to read 500 lines of records for a txt file.
>
>
>
> Scenario:
>
> After run the jmeter test plan with above setting, all the 500 records
> successfully process and displayed in jmeter.log
>
>
>
> Finding:
>
> As checking through the log file, noticed that the  started time of
> jmeter.threads seem to delay 1 second while reach some interval of
> records, for example as following:
>
> ========================================================================
> ===============================================
>
> From line 1 to line 67:
>
> 2/16/2006          10:33:20        INFO  - jmeter.threads.JMeterThread:
> Thread Thread 11-  11350686442769 1-67    started
> 11359080793880            10:36:30
>
>
>
> At Line 68 to line 158:
>
> 2/16/2006          10:33:21        INFO  - jmeter.threads.JMeterThread:
> Thread Thread 11-  11350686442769 1-68    started
> 11359080793897            10:36:31
>
>
>
> At Line 159 to line 191:
>
> 2/16/2006          10:33:22        INFO  - jmeter.threads.JMeterThread:
> Thread Thread 11-  11350686442769 1-19    1 started
> 11359080795129            10:39:36
>
> ========================================================================
> ===============================================
>
>
>
> Question:
>
> The started time should be all the same from line 1 to line 500 records
> as we are doing the concurrent thread running, anybody have any idea how
> to make the "started" become consistent through the process?
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to