Thanks a lot. For Windows XP there is Service Pack 2 Support Tools that includes this tool and many others for monitoring the system. Pavel
On 2/22/06, Lincoln, Adym <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pavel, > > There use to be a simple Windows program call pmon.exe, short for > process monitor. I just tried it on my Windows 2000 Professional and > couldn't find it. I use to use it on Windows 95/NT many moons ago when > I was doing Windows/M$ development, but I've since fallen behind with > regards to Windows/Visual Studio development. > > Bottom line, pmon.exe is probably still around and it should give you a > clearer picture of processes on your Windows box then Task Manager... > > hth, > > > > Adym Lincoln > I/S Corporate - I/S Internal Applications > 603-245-8245 > Ext : 58245 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ... > It's a bug planet...it's an ugly planet...ever feel like your software > project is going in the wrong direction. > ... > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pavel Gouchtchine [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:43 PM > To: JMeter Users List > Subject: Re: Thread number and Ramp-up time relationship? > > Thank you for the question. > The threads just start at once. It is true. Now I understand it. > And I don't know how to monitor the number of started (running) threads. > Does any body know? Please, give an advise. > > Pavel > > > On 2/22/06, sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > But do the threads *start* earlier than expected, or is it just that > > the threads are created all at once? > > > > S. > > On 22/02/06, Pavel Gouchtchine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi All. > > > I am using JMeter 2.1.1 on Windows XP. > > > > > > According JMeter documentation: > > > " The ramp-up period tells JMeter how long to take to "ramp-up" to > the > > full > > > number of threads chosen. If 10 threads are used, and the ramp-up > period > > is > > > 100 seconds, then JMeter will take 100 seconds to get all 10 threads > up > > and > > > running. Each thread will start 10 (100/10) seconds after the > previous > > > thread was begun. If there are 30 threads and a ramp-up period of > 120 > > > seconds, then each successive thread will be delayed by 4 seconds." > > > > > > I have started to monitor number of threads using Task Manager and I > see > > > that all threads starts at once, and ramp-up time doesn't play any > role > > > here. > > > For example, when I have Number of Threads: 1000 and Ramp up time 60 > > sec, I > > > am expecting to get all 1000 threads up and running only in 60 sec. > > That I > > > see is different: all 1000 threads started at once. > > > > > > Is it something, that I am missing in configuration or it is a > problem? > > > > > > Thank you. > > > Pavel Gouchtchine > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
