On 08/03/06, Shih-Chen Chiang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Sebb, > > I also tried the summariser and got the following result: > > summary_report + 72 in 81.9s = 0.9/s Avg: 2189 Min: 100 Max: > 10555 Err: 8 (11.11%) > [GC > Desired survivor size 6684672 bytes, new threshold 1 (max 2) > - age 1: 7647760 bytes, 7647760 total > - age 2: 2566792 bytes, 10214552 total > 112569K->11458K(249088K), 0.0235843 secs] > summary_report + 8 in 6.7s = 1.2/s Avg: 832 Min: 110 Max: > 4006 Err: 0 (0.00%) > summary_report = 80 in 88.6s = 0.9/s Avg: 2053 Min: 100 Max: > 10555 Err: 8 (10.00%) > > But I set summariser.interval=180. It looks like the intervals are > 81.9, 6.7, and 88.6 seconds instead. Did I miss anything?
It's difficult to be sure why the time differences are as shown without the timestamps. The reports are supposed to be generated every N seconds on the N-second boundary, so the first report is normally generated after fewer than N seconds have elapsed. Likewise, the last report is generated at the end of the run, which may not be a multiple of N seconds. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
