On 06/04/06, Sonam Chauhan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Sebb. I found the problem - we were been already using the '-p > <property_file>' parameter for parameters used by our parameterized test > scripts. This meant Jmeter ignored it's property file, which were OK > till 2.1.1 gained a new "file_format.testlog=2.0" setting. Hence I added > "-Dfile_format.testlog=2.0" to our invocation. > > Yes, I see the NPE in jmeter.log. I had put up documentation on the > 1.9.1. log format on the wiki (LogAnalysis section) earlier. Once I > finish, I'll add documentation on the default 2.1.1 log format
Thanks! > (file_format.testlog=2.0). Do correct any fault in my assumptions > below: > > > --------------------- > > <sampleResult timeStamp="1144217221253" ...><assertionResult > > ...></sampleResult> > > --------------------- > > This resembles the old log format, but has different nested elements: > > - The old practice of representing 302 redirects as <sampleResult> > > subelements is gone. > > - New <assertionResult> subelements now occur under <sampleResult>. > > > A comment regarding the new log format: From what I understand, the new > log format will use <httpSample> for the HTTP sampler and <sampleResult> > for the JDBC sampler. Just from a automated log processing point of > view, having uniform <sampleResult> element for all log entries is more > predicatable. Alternatively, where specialized elements like > <httpSample> are used, some documentation on the special elements > (perhaps a DTD?) would be needed to properly process logs. Yes, it uses different node names for the different sample types. At present different classes are needed to handle the two sample types; not sure how easy it would be to combine these. > On another topic - can JMeter be set to stream results / log entries to > another application as testing occurs (as opposed to processing the log > file when tests complete). This other application could be, say, a > generic testing engine (as in our case), syslog, a system management > framework, etc. Potentially one could write a different processor. Not sure how easy it would be to integrate it. The latest code has a BeanShell Listener if you want to play with that ... it could be used to generate a separate output stream. > I was browsing some entries in jmeter.properties and came across these > entries for JMeter 'remote testing' below. > Is it possible to easily adapt JMeter remote testing to stream results > to another application? Dunno. > What protocol do the master and remote servers > use to communicate with each other? RMI - the samples are returned to the client. > ----------------------------------- > # Remote batching support > # default is Standard, which returns each sample > # Hold retains samples until end of test (may need lots of memory) > # Batch returns samples in batches > # hold_samples was originally defined as a separate property, > # but can now also be defined using remote.mode > #mode=Standard > #mode=Batch > #mode=Hold > #hold_samples=true > #num_sample_threshold=100 > #time_threshold=60000 > ----------------------------------- These just affect when the samples are returned. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
