What has this to do with the Header Manager bug? Perhaps you could explain the purpose of the new class?
If these changes are enhancements to the HTTPSampler2 class, then perhaps they should be added as options, rather than as a brand new class. S. On 05/10/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, Thought this might be of use to someone else trying to do the same thing with low Java skills ;). Things I had to change to get Body to be sent and a New Method called REPORT to be added... Changes to HTTPSampler2.java
[...]
Reza >From: sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" <[email protected]> >To: "JMeter Users List" <[email protected]> >Subject: Re: Header Manager bug? >Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 13:58:56 +0100 > >There's already a similar bug report; I suggest you update it with >your information if necessary. > >On 03/10/06, R R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Hi, >> >>Not sure if this is intended behaviour if not I will raise a bugzilla. >> >>If you copy the Header Manager to another sampler in another thread group >>and then change a value in the header (not the header name, so change the >>value of Depth from 1 to 2 for example). It will change the value for all >>of >>the Header Managers not just the one that was changed. I assume this is as >>they are referring to the same object. >> >>A workaround is to not use the copy and past but to either create a new >>header manager in the thread group or delete the old value and then >>re-insert it. >> >>Intended? >> >>R
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
