On 16/04/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sebb, Thanks for the suggestion, however I am already running the latest nightly build.Not sure what you are getting at with regards to the following, perhaps you could shed some light? > "it would not make sense for it to include the contents of any files for example."
Mainly because the files may be quite large - why bother wasting all that memory when the data can be read from the file? In general, the request contents are known, because they are in the test plan, but of course any variable substitutions are not shown.
We are talking about an XML post operation, so why would it not make sense to see this request? I mean I see the response in all of it's XML glory. I know that someone else fixed this by: > adding the following line before return from the sample method: > res.setURL(new URL(res.getURL().getProtocol(), res.getURL().getHost(), res.getURL().getPort(), res.getURL().getFile() + "\n\n" + getXmlData())); This is not a big issue for me, but it would definitely help troubleshooting bad requests (without having to rely on getting output from my listener on the server side), more than anything it just seems like a bug to me...given that the response tab is being populated with real data it seems to me that the request tab should as well.
Actually there is a Bugzilla issue about NOT storing all data: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41921 this relates to responses, but the problem is the same - memory usage. Check whether there is already a Bugzilla enhancement for this; if not, feel free to add one... --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
