> I suspect the larger size is caused by the error message when the
> timeout happens.
>

But this shouldn't take up any bandwidth, I assume the error message
is not from the server, the client just times out and continues. The
test plan takes much longer when time-outs are enabled and I assumed
it was the bandwidth due to the 1815 file size.



> It would help if the success and response code fields were included in
> the items logged.

timeStamp,elapsed,label,responseCode,responseMessage,threadName,dataType,success,failureMessage,bytes,grpThreads,allThreads,URL,Filename,Latency,Encoding


1193316042700,32,HTTP Request HTTPClient,200,OK,Thread Group
1-1,text,true,,44,7,7,https://cala01.ac.uk:8083/index.html,,32,ISO-8859-1


1193316042484,203,HTTP Request HTTPClient,Non HTTP response code:
java.net.SocketTimeoutException,Non HTTP response message: Read timed
out,Thread Group
1-4,text,false,,1815,7,7,https://cala01.ac.uk:8083/index.html,,0,ISO-8859-1

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to