--- sebb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On 27/10/2007, Richard Hubbell
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is the jmx. So you don't have to go back over
> the
> > thread on this I was having problems where jmeter
> > would send requests to the server like
> http://.*/.*
> >
> > I'd really like to figure out how to have it not
> do
> > that since it creates a lot of noise in the server
> > logs and in the jmeter logs, etc.
> >
> > If this is hard to read I can re-send as an
> > attachment.
> 
> It *is* hard to read - and makes the mail hard for
> others to read.
> Anyway it is not usable as it stands.
> 
> However, please don't send attachments to the list
> either.
> 
> Either store the JMX file on a public server, or
> create a Bugzilla
> issue and attach the file to that.

I guess bugzilla would be best in this case, I'll do
that.  In a sense it's unfortunate that the jmx files
can't be discussed right here since this is a user
group and users seem to have many questions about the
jmx since the jmx is everything.

Jmeter is the jmx from a user perspective.

> 
> Please make sure that any such test cases are as
> small as possible (no
> extraneous stuff) and all necessary supporting files
> are present.
> Also please attach a copy of the jmeter log file
> from running the test case.
> 
> In the case of your JMX, I did manage to get the
> file to load
> (eventually), but it is unusable as there are
> several mising files.
> 
> It's not clear that the While Controller is
> guaranteed to exit, and
> the Link Parser is being applied to the previous
> sample in the loop so
> it's not surprising that it sometimes does not find
> a match - are all
> the previous pages guaranteed to contain a link or a
> form?

It is possible, but what's the alternative for
recursing over links on pages? I tried using the
feature in the HTTP Request sampler to get only
"Embedded URLs must match" regex but that was too
limiting.  Can you describe in greater detail how
complex a regex can go into that field?

Would something like this work?
href="([^"]+)"|img="([^\s]+)"|imgurl="([^\s]+)"

I think you get the idea, there are more than one type
of embedded url I'm interested in traversing further.

I also tried http://.+/.+ but that didn't work, but I
would have thought that would have solved the issue.
Maybe it's a missing feature/bug.

In regexdom it's a bad idea to use .*, it should be
used sparingly.


> 
> Another issue is using 1000 threads with 1 loop just
> does not make sense.

Does not make sense in general or just to you? It
makes sense to me. I would have used 10,000 but the
jvm is a bit hungry with memory.  There may be some
tuning still needed.  Stack size, etc.

Imagine that each loop does more than one thing.


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to