On 04/04/2008, Jae Joo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yes, I have same experience. The average time of AB is always faster than > jmeter. > AB is very light, but jmeter has it's overhead.
JMeter does have a higher overhead, but that is not the whole picture. The overheads in JMeter are mainly to do with what happens between requests. If I remember correctly, AB handles connections differently. Also, is AB sending the same amount of data as JMeter? > Specially, in client/server environment, it is different a lot. > > If you can, run AB and jmeter in the server - no network traffic overhead. > The difference between jmeter and ab will be shrink down. The network overhead will be much the same for AB and JMeter, unless you are using JMeter in client-server mode. > > Jae > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thu 4/3/2008 10:59 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Difference in AB and JMeter Results. > > Hi, > > > > We are getting difference in response time results for same tests from > JMeter and Apache-Benchmark. > > For same 10 users' response-time for single iterations: > > JMeter Response-time: 5000ms > > AB Response-time: 2500ms > > > > Please let me know if there is any possibility which is causing > response-time delay from JMeter. > > > > PS: Both of the tests done from the same environment (client/server > environment). > > > > Warm regards, > Kaushal Kishore > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
