>  A small tip found for future idiots like me (maybe should be noted in
>  documentation?) is that function names seem to be case sensative 
> where  variables are not?
>

> They are both case-sensitive.

Ok, - I had not tested before writing that.  That would be a helpful tip
in the documentation.


>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 9:21 AM
>  To: JMeter Users List
>  Subject: Re: Help with __counter function
>
>  On 09/04/2008, Steve Kapinos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > I tried using a UDV simply setting vcsCount = ${__threadNum} in the

> > start of my thread group.
>  >
>
>  See:
>
>  
> http://jakarta.apache.org/jmeter/usermanual/functions.html#__threadNum
>
>  which says:
>
>  "This function does not work in any Configuration elements (e.g. User

> Defined Variables) as these are run from a separate thread."
>
>  >  The test plan is setup with a single thread group, several  > 
> configuration  elements, followed by a logic controller which includes
>
>  > all the  samplers, followed by the listeners for
reporting/debugging.
>  >
>  >  Thread Plan
>  >   UDV
>  >   UDV
>  >   CSV
>  >   Loop Controller
>  >     Simple Controllers
>  >       Sampler
>  >       Timer
>  >     [..]
>  >   Simple Data Writer
>  >   Debug Sampler
>  >   View Results Tree
>  >
>  >  But I noticed two behaviors..
>  >
>  >  threadNum I guess increments with total threads since the jmeter  
> > instance started..  It did not correlate to 'thread 1', 'thread 2',

> > etc  like I expected for each run, but rather 'thread 38' or 
> something
>
>  > since  the jmeter instance started (testing in GUI).
>
>  See above.
>
>  >  While variables are supposed to be local to a thread only - if I 
> told
>
>  > the thread group to run 3 times (3 'users').. The debug sampler 
> showed
>
>  > vcscount = to the same value for all three thread instances.
>  >
>  >  Is __threadNum simply not usable and not the same as 'user1'
'user2'
>  >  'user3' meaning of 'thread' ?
>  >
>  >  I will try with a user paremeter similar to your suggestion now  >

> >  >  -----Original Message-----  >  From: sebb 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]  >  > Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 8:16 
> AM  >  To: JMeter Users List  >  > Subject: Re: Help with __counter 
> function  >  >  On 09/04/2008, Steve Kapinos 
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >  > Any help sebb?  I know what I want is simple, just I'm stupid 
> and  > > can't  figure out how to do it right.
>  >
>  >  It does not seem to be simple...
>  >
>  >  Try using the counter in a User Parameters Pre-Processor as a 
> child  > of  the first sampler - that will run once.
>  >
>  >  >  It's a counter simply shared by all threads, but I want to  > 
> increment  >  >  > once at the start of each thread and then be able 
> to reference that
>
>  > > instance of the count value throughout the thread.
>  >
>  >  Understood.
>  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  -----Original Message-----
>  >  >  From: Steve Kapinos
>  >  >  Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 8:07 PM  >  To: JMeter Users List

> >
>
>  > > Subject: RE: Help with __counter function  >  >  Rather simple in

> > the practical sense..
>  >  >
>  >  >  I need each thread to use a different number for each pass that

> > will  > not  overlap with the other threads executing.
>  >  >
>  >  >  One thread could use '1' for its first pass second thread could

> > use  '2'
>  >  >  for its first pass
>  >  >
>  >  >  On the second pass, they need to use a new number, as to 
> prevent  > > possible overlap with another thread that is still
running.
>  >  >
>  >  >  So I have a UDV at the start of a thread defining a count,  
> vcsCount.
>  >  >  The thread uses that variable in the rest of the thread group 
> as  > the  >  >  > unique variable... with the hope that each time a 
> pass through the
>
>  > > thread group is executed, the count is incremented.
>  >  >
>  >  >  Thinking out loud now.. I guess that should be a User Parameter

> > that  >  >  > should have the checkbox marked instead of a UDV 
> shouldn't I?  But  > I  > don't understand why the current 
> implementation seems to  > increment  > everytime vcsCount is 
> referenced.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  -----Original Message-----
>  >  >  From:   sebb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >  Sent:   Tue 4/8/2008 6:35 PM
>  >  >  To:     JMeter Users List
>  >  >  Cc:
>  >  >  Subject:        Re: Help with __counter function
>  >  >
>  >  >  What do you mean by "unique per thread"?
>  >  >
>  >  >  If there are two threads, unique per thread could mean that 
> they  > each  >  >  > see the same unique set of numbers, or that each

> thread sees  > numbers  > that are different from the numbers seen in 
> all other  threads.
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >  On 08/04/2008, Steve Kapinos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>  >  >  > I'm trying to create an integeter that is going to be unique 
> per
>
>  > > thread.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  I have a UDV element defining  >  >  >  >  >  >  
> vcsGlobalCount  ${__counter(FALSE,vcsCount)}  >  >  However,  > each  
> > time vcsCount is referenced, that seems to increment  > the  
> counter.
>  >
>  >  > I would have thought the counter would only increment  > when 
> the  > UDV  >  >  > element was ran.. Each time a thread starts.
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  What is the proper way of handling a counter like this that

> > should  >  >  > be  >  >  >  >  > unique per thread in this fashion?
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  Thx
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >  -Steve
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >  >  For additional commands, e-mail:
>  >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >  >
>  >  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >  For additional commands, e-mail:
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >  For additional commands, e-mail:
>  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >
>  >  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to