It's hard to say what is good or bad without a better understanding of what's being tested.
In general, we can see that you've got a pretty consistent throughput once everything is up and running (steady state). On average, you have a 460ms response time for your samples, though there is a deviation of around 560ms, which definitely shows in the overall spread of the small black dots. It seems that some requests are taking almost 900ms to complete (which pushes up the average and variance), although most of them are clustered around the median 230ms. I'd say that you should look into what was going on around the unusually slow requests. Also, I think that this visualizer wraps around after a certain number of samples, which may explain the jumble of lines. You would be best off exporting your results to CSV and plotting in something like Excel or Openoffice. You might have to XSLT it down to a CSV format if you are dumping to XML. For longer and larger runs, (greater than 64k or 1M samples) you might want to consider using some other graphing and processing tools instead. On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:57 PM, ziohausam <[email protected]> wrote: > > I understand all terms as statistical concepts ( median deviation. etc) but i > can't interpret the graph. and i don't know if these numbers are good or bad > indicators. any help or a reference to a help? > > Regards, > Hosam > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/How-can-i-interpret-results--tp21527578p21545803.html > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
