Hi Deepak, Cheers for the reply. And tell me thou in terms of Stress Testing I would see the advantages you added as minor (as i may not want to include them in my build be manual monitoring its progress and results too large to convert to html) whereas on the downside Ant itself will require extra Memory on the box. Reducing its availability to JMeter.
Whereas running from the cmd line JMeter can make use of all available memory. So in terms of handling resources etc where would the advantages lie in Ant?? Thanks again, Andyy... Deepak Shetty wrote: > > Well all the advantages that ANT provides (You can make the test part of > your build, be notified of failures, generate the HTMl report by styling > etc) > I > > On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Andyy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Evening, >> >> When performance testing what are the benefits to using Ant versus >> the command line in non GUI Mode??? Or vise versa??? >> >> Cheers.. >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Performance-Testing-with-JMeter-on-the-cmd-line-or-Ant----tp23656302p23656302.html >> Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Performance-Testing-with-JMeter-on-the-cmd-line-or-Ant----tp23656302p23657067.html Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
