On 31/07/2009, Pieter Ennes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31-07-09 13:24, Pieter Ennes wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > We're a bit confused about the numbers in this XML snippet (edited for > > readability, hope not too much removed): > > > > <httpSample t="3773" lt="0" [...] rc="200" rm="OK" by="709260"> > > <httpSample t="2608" lt="595" rc="302" rm="Found" > > by="321851"/>
Seems like a very large size for a redirect. > > <httpSample t="1163" lt="988" rc="200" rm="OK" by="65558"/> > > </httpSample> > > > > Element had follow redirects on, redirect automatically off. > > > > t = 2608 + 1163 = 3771 There may be slight gaps between the samples so the overall time can be slightly longer than the sum of the individual samples. > > lt = 595 + 988 = 1583 Latency cannot be added; it applies to a single sample only. > > by = 321851 + 65558 = 387409 > > > > Heh, my colleague found out that for 'by' coincidentally: > > Total (709260) - Expected (387409) is exactly the size of the first request > (321851) > > Which is a bit odd at least, and would suggest that the byte size of first > request is counted twice in the parent. Not sure how this translates to the > timing though. Yes, that does look a bit odd; need to look further at that. > -- > - Pieter > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
