Thanks for the reply! We are updating the JVM on our linux machine, since it was 1.4.2 and my machine was 1.5.0.
Carl On 10/23/09 10:05 AM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 20/10/2009, Carl Shaulis <[email protected]> wrote: >> Riddle me this batman! >> >> If I execute a test of 100 threads using my machine as the master and a >> linux machine as the slave with each thread executing a single request I do >> NOT get any negative response times. >> >> If I schedule a test of 100 threads to run 5 minutes looping indefinitely >> the single request, I am getting negative response times. >> >> This does not make sense to me. >> >> More thoughts? >> > > The elapsed times are calculated by the sampler, so clock skew won't > affect them. The times > > Which version of JMeter are you using? > JVM? > > The elapsed time calculation depends on both of these. > > Do the timestamps look reasonable? > >> Carl >> >> >> >> On 10/20/09 1:14 PM, "Peter Lin" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> both systems must be insync. >>> >>> That's fundamental to all distributed applications, including >>> distributed testing. >>> >>> peter >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Carl Shaulis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> The difference appears to be about 10 seconds between the clock on my >>>> machine and the slave server. I added a constant timer and that made no >>>> difference. >>>> >>>> Do the two machines really have to be set down to the exact second? >>>> >>>> I would think we are measuring the delta between start and stop on the same >>>> machine, so the clocks should not matter. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Carl >>>> >>>> On 10/20/09 1:06 PM, "Deepak Shetty" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> are the time clocks on both machines in sync? >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Carl Shaulis >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hello, >>>>>> >>>>>> We have recently set up a distributed JMeter environment. I am using my >>>>>> MacBook Pro as the Master and a Linux machine as the slave. I executed a >>>>>> very simple test for 5 minutes, where 500 concurrent users access a >>>>>> static >>>>>> html page. The results showed an average response time of 0 ms. Looking >>>>>> more closely at the data there are numerous transactions that look like >>>>>> this. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thread Name: SorryPageTest 1-97 >>>>>> Sample Start: 2009-10-20 12:42:29 CDT >>>>>> Load time: -897 >>>>>> Latency: -897 >>>>>> Size in bytes: 1723 >>>>>> Sample Count: 1 >>>>>> Error Count: 0 >>>>>> Response code: 200 >>>>>> Response message: OK >>>>>> >>>>>> How can you get a negative load time and negative latency with a 200 >>>>>> response code? >>>>>> >>>>>> Help! >>>>>> >>>>>> Carl >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
