Hi what I mean in the Beanshell preprocessor is that there is no need for you to form the String (I believe you said you were ). You can loop through your extracted values and use addArgument in a loop.
Alternately if your extracted value already has the concatenated value you want to send, you can parse the String and use addArgument again(using split on & and then for each value split on =) regards deepak On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Richard Gaywood <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Deepak Shetty <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I dont think you can mix the parameters with no names with parameters > with > > names (either all should have or none should have). > > > > Yes, I think you are correct. > > > > As before i believe you can get you stuff to work easier with BSH pre > > processor > > > I've had a go at that. http://stuff.fscked.co.uk/foo2.zip > > Both attempt7 and attempt8 encode the contents of ${foo}, even though one > invokes addArgument() and the other addEncodedArgument(). Attempt9 tries to > use only a no-name parameter in the sampler and add other parameters using > a > pre-processor, but that doesn't work either, the other parameters are > ignored. > > I'm really stuck here :( >
