Ah ok. I assumed from you previous mail that they "should just work" as is :)

Regards,
Noel

----- sebb  wrote:
> On 15/02/2010, Noel O'Brien  wrote:
> > Not for me, but it would be good to hear from other forum user's too :)
> >
> >  FYI, image attachments are not being rendered in the View Results Tree 
> > listener for me (JMeter 2.3.4), it just appears as a stream of characters
> 
> Yes. But if/when each part is stored as a separate sample, this
> problem should disappear.
> 
> >
> >  Regards,
> >  Noel
> >
> >  ----- "sebb"  wrote:
> >  > Images should just work.
> >  >
> >  > The down-side is that the test plan output will be different from
> >  > before; is that likely to be a major problem?
> >  >
> >  > On 15/02/2010, Noel O'Brien  wrote:
> >  > > Yeah that sounds like it'll do the trick. The only other thing I'd 
> > suggest would be rendering images in the same way as with images in http 
> > sample results, if it's possible
> >  > >
> >  > >
> >  > > Regards,
> >  > > Noel
> >  > >
> >  > > ----- "sebb"  wrote:
> >  > > > Yes, there do seem to be some problems.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > At present each message is handled as a single sample which is added
> >  > > > as a child of the parent sample result.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > If the message is a multipart message, then this causes problems,
> >  > > > because each part of a multi-part message has its own Content-Type,
> >  > > > but of course a single result can only have one content-type.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > At present the result content-type is taken from the multipart
> >  > > > container, which does not have an encoding, and anyway the content
> >  > > > itself is assumed to be in the default encoding. Not ideal.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > Maybe multipart messages should be handled as one child per part?
> >  > > > These would then become grandchildren of the original sample.
> >  > > > If there is only a single part it could be stored as at present, but
> >  > > > with the content-type taken from the part rather than the multi-part
> >  > > > container.
> >  > > >
> >  > > > Does that sound reasonable?
> >  > > > Any better ideas?
> >  > > >
> >  > > > On 15/02/2010, Noel O'Brien  wrote:
> >  > > > > Using JMeter 2.3.4, there is more attachment related information 
> > and the multi-part messages seem to be decoded once the "Store the message 
> > using MIME" checkbox is ticked. There's still a UTF-8 issue though;
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > • Subject sent: " Méðíá Sénd Téßþ "
> >  > > > > • Subject received (not decoded): "Méðíá Sénd Téßþ"
> >  > > > > • Subject received (decoded): 
> > "=?utf-8?B?TcOpw7DDrcOhIFPDqW5kIFTDqcOfw74=?="
> >  > > > > • Body sent: " Tesþ Bóð¥ "
> >  > > > > • Body received (decoded): "Tes=C3=BE B=C3=B3=C3=B0=C2=A5=20"
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > Regards,
> >  > > > > Noel
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > >
> >  > > > > ----- "Noel O'Brien"  wrote:
> >  > > > > > Sure, I'll give it a go and report my findings
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > > Regards,
> >  > > > > > Noel
> >  > > > > >
> >  > > > > > ----- "sebb"  wrote:
> >  > > > > > > On 15/02/2010, Noel O'Brien  wrote:
> >  > > > > > > > Apologies, forgot to attach the useful information ;)
> >  > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > • OS: Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux olympia 2.6.31-19-generic-pae 
> > #56-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 28 02:29:51 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux)
> >  > > > > > > > • Java: Sun version "1.6.0_18"
> >  > > > > > > > • Javamail: 1.4.1 (mail.jar only)
> >  > > > > > > > • JMeter: 2.3.2 r665936
> >  > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > Can you try JMeter 2.3.4?
> >  > > > > > > There are a lot of fixes since 2.3.2.
> >  > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > • Sampler: Mail Reader Sampler
> >  > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > • Server Type: IMAP
> >  > > > > > > > • Server: 
> >  > > > > > > > • Username: 
> >  > > > > > > > • Password: 
> >  > > > > > > > • Folder: INBOX
> >  > > > > > > > • Number of messages to retrieve: All
> >  > > > > > > > • Delete messages from the server: false
> >  > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > Regards,
> >  > > > > > > > Noel
> >  > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > ----- "sebb"  wrote:
> >  > > > > > > > > On 15/02/2010, Noel O'Brien  wrote:
> >  > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> >  > > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > > I've two questions regarding the mail sampler:
> >  > > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > > 1. Is it possible to have JMeter decode multi-part 
> > messages?
> >  > > > > > > > > > 2. Is it possible to have JMeter force UTF-8 encoding 
> > when reading/displaying the mail
> >  > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > Which version of JMeter and Javamail are you using? OS?
> >  > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > Which sampler are you using? Which options? IMAP(S) ? 
> > POP3(S) ?
> >  > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > > As part of my tests I'm using my product to send emails 
> > and using JMeter to confirm that the emails arrive and contain the correct 
> > information. However I've found that when I use UTF-8 characters in the 
> > mail subject, it appears scrambled in JMeters View results tree listener 
> > and assertions against the value fail. Using several mail clients 
> > (thunderbird, etc.), the mail appears fine in terms of character encoding. 
> > Can JMeter handle UTF-8 chars in emails?
> >  > > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > > The emails I've sent have a message bady and attachment, 
> > though when the mail is sampled in JMeter it shows up as:
> >  > > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > > Multipart. Count: 2 Type: multipart/ALTERNATIVE; 
> > boundary="----=_Part_60_10050345.1266233578389" 
> > javax.mail.internet.mimemultip...@1852958 Type: IMAGE/JPEG; 
> > name=6149b5b039ac499baeaf70a02d1d7a37.jpg 
> > com.sun.mail.util.base64decoderstr...@15d585d
> >  > > > > > > > > > I can assert on the attachment, but the message body is 
> > not displayed. Is it possible for JMeter to decode multi-part message by, 
> > e.g. a parameter?
> >  > > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> >  > > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > > Noel
> >  > > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> > [email protected]
> >  > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [email protected]
> >  > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > > 
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: 
> > [email protected]
> >  > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: 
> > [email protected]
> >  > > > > > >
> >  > > > > > >
> >  > > >
> >  > >
> >  > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >  > >
> >  > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >  > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >  > > >
> >  > > >
> >  >
> >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >  >
> >  >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 

Reply via email to