OK. On 17/06/2010, João Tiago Ferreira <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, i will post my logs in this issue: > https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46142 . You agree? > > João > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sebb [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: quinta-feira, 17 de Junho de 2010 13:33 > To: JMeter Users List > Subject: Re: Jmeter JMS support for Tibco EMS > > On 17/06/2010, João Tiago Ferreira <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I am using jmeter to perform some functional tests in our application. I > > need to send a request for the JMS server and wait for a response. > > > > Our use case for the the use of correlation and message ids is that the > > messageID of the request is used to set the correlationID of the response. > > OK. > > > Using jmeter JMS request response the correlation is not working as > > expected, neither in 2.3.4 or nightly builds. > > I'm not surprised about 2.3.4, however I thought the nightly builds were > better. > > Have you tried both settings of "Use Request Message Id As Correlation Id"? > > > > > I send the logs as attachments. > > Please don't send attachments to the list. > In this case they got lost anyway. > > Post them somewhere public and send the link, or create a Bugzilla > issue and attach them there. That is probably best in this case. > > > > > > > As far as I can understand the JMS Sampler is using the messageID of the > > response to match the messageID of the request, > > I don't think it does that, but I'll check. > > > while it should use the correlationID of the response. > > Sometimes - I think that depends on how the JMS service is configured. > > > I easily modified the source to fit my needs, but wanted to contribute my > > testing with Tibco EMS. I also noted that several bug reports exist about > > this issue. > > Yes, this is a tricky area, partly because JMS knowledge within the > team is limited, and partly because the protocol does not seem to be > particularly well-defined with regard to how correlationId is treated. > > AIUI, not all JMS providers behave the same way: > Some may copy the request messageId to the response correlationId. > Others may copy the request correlationId to the response correlationId. > There may be other behaviours. > > I could not find any documentation that defines what the "correct" behaviour > is. > As far as I could tell, the setting of the response correlationId is > server- or application-defined. [If you have details, please post a > link to the docs!] > > If changes need to be made to support Tibco JMS, we need to ensure > that these don't prevent JMeter from working with other JMS providers > - or indeed with other different configurations of Tibco. > > This probably means adding some optional behaviour to the correlation > processing so users can configure it as needed. > > I think the first stage would be to get JMeter working with Tibco, and > then look at how to provide configuration options for any changes that > might be needed. > > So please create a Bugzilla with your suggested changes, and logs from > current JMeter. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
