Hello,

thank you for your replies.

The problem is we use one large machine with multiple Virtual Machines on it - 
so there is a total limit to the cpu and memory.

More slaves means more overhead in terms of the machine setup.

All things being equal (less than 80% utilisation) is it better to have more 
threads or more slaves?

Will jmeter produce similar results when running 10 threads on 1 slave and 1 
thread on 10 slaves?


Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Jörg Godau

SCHÜTZE Consulting Informationssysteme GmbH Argentinische Allee 22b
14163 Berlin
Tel.: 030/ 802 49 44
Fax: 030/ 8090 39 95
www.schuetze-berlin.de

Geschäftsführer: Klaus-Dieter Schütze
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg
Registernummer: HRB 73618
Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer gemäß § 27a Umsatzsteuergesetz: DE 813181239


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Ragini Thakur [mailto:[email protected]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 21. Juli 2010 10:42
> An: JMeter Users List
> Betreff: RE: Many slaves or many threads?
> 
> I agree with Chaitanya. You can monitor the CPU and memory utilization
> of slave machines and based on that may decide to add more threads or
> more slaves in the setup.
> 
> Regards,
> Ragini Thakur
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: chaitanya bhatt [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:07 PM
> To: JMeter Users List
> Subject: Re: Many slaves or many threads?
> 
> Jörg,
> 
> It depends on the hardware configuration of the injector machines. 100
> threads is perfectly sensible if your injector machine is a quad-core
> machine with at least 2-3 gigs of ram. But if you have a low
> configuration
> machine then even 100 threads might be too taxing for it.
> 
> The key to find out what is sensible load on the injector and what is
> not is
> by monitoring the injector machine first -- to see if something is
> crossing
> the 80% utilization watermark in the resource front.  If yes then
> reduce the
> threads and introduce more slaves, if no then increase the threads.
> -Chaitanya M Bhatt
> 2010/7/21 Jörg Godau <[email protected]>
> 
> > Hello All,
> >
> > we are trying to configure our testing environment in an optimal
> fashion.
> >
> > We would like to have 100 or more parallel threads hitting our
> application
> > server.
> >
> > At the moment we are using 10 jmeter-slaves each running 10 threads
> (each
> > slave runs in a virtual machine).
> >
> > Is this a sensible setup?
> >
> > Would we be better off running 1 jmeter-slave with 100 threads?
> >
> > Or 5 slaves with 20 threads?
> >
> > Or something else?
> >
> > How does everyone else setup tests that use many threads/processes?
> >
> >
> > Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> > Jörg Godau
> >
> > SCHÜTZE Consulting Informationssysteme GmbH Argentinische Allee 22b
> > 14163 Berlin
> > Tel.: 030/ 802 49 44
> > Fax: 030/ 8090 39 95
> > www.schuetze-berlin.de
> >
> > Geschäftsführer: Klaus-Dieter Schütze
> > Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg
> > Registernummer: HRB 73618
> > Umsatzsteuer-Identifikationsnummer gemäß § 27a Umsatzsteuergesetz: DE
> > 813181239
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
> 
> "Legal Disclaimer: This electronic message and all contents contain
> information from Cybage Software Private Limited which may be
> privileged, confidential, or otherwise protected from disclosure. The
> information is intended to be for the addressee(s) only. If you are not
> an addressee, any disclosure, copy, distribution, or use of the
> contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> this electronic message in error please notify the sender by reply e-
> mail to and destroy the original message and all copies. Cybage has
> taken every reasonable precaution to minimize the risk of malicious
> content in the mail, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain
> as a result of any malicious content in this e-mail. You should carry
> out your own malicious content checks before opening the e-mail or
> attachment."
> www.cybage.com
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> 



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to