Hi, > > I tried a simple program comparing systemTime and nanoTime, and found > that it does seem to drift (WinXP/Java1.6). This is not the impression > one gets from the Javadoc... > > Maybe the base times need to be regenerated more frequently - perhaps > even every sample, leaving the nanotime just for elapsed time. Maybe > even support just systemTime. (Might be best to make the changed > implementation(s) optional.)
I would prefer an option that gets the time ether from currentTimeMillis() or from nanoTime(). On windows, the latter gets its value from the QueryPerformanceCounter() API which causes the drift from the system-clock. Please keep me (us) informed! Cheers, Andrej --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
