Thanks for the paper. I am surprised that HP Performance Center or Loadrunner was not mentioned. That is considered the top tool for performance testing. I have used both for years and have participated in evaluations using Forester and Gartener and it is the best comercial tool.
Also, we just started using version 11 of Performace Center and the truclient protocol does seem to be solving the problem with AJAX emulation something critical for performance testing. The list of protocols supported in these tools is critical for big companies and having the right people use them more so. Regards, -Tony --- On Sat, 9/10/11, Oscar Eduardo Cala Wilches <oscarc...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Oscar Eduardo Cala Wilches <oscarc...@gmail.com> > Subject: Feature comparision among some software tools for load testing. > To: jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org > Date: Saturday, September 10, 2011, 3:02 PM > Hi every body. > > Recently a paper was published at Universidad Nacional de > Colombia ( > http://www.unal.edu.co). The article's title is: > > Feature comparision among some software tools for load > testing. > > The paper can be downloaded from > http://intranet.minas.medellin.unal.edu.co/~pruebasminas/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=1901&Itemid=285 > > It was published under the "Avances en Sistemas e > Informática" Journal. > > The paper describes a rankin system created by the authors > in order to > qualify different load testing tools. > > JMeter did obtain a great score and was the best ranked > Open Source Tool. > Its score was very close compared with the score reached by > privative > tools. > > It is a very good result for JMeter, so I want to share it > with you. > > Greetings. > > -- > ATT. > Oscar Eduardo Cala W. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscr...@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-h...@jakarta.apache.org
