At 01:20 25/03/2004 +0100, Miguel wrote:
I do not understand the difference between _ (underscore) and . (dot) in
CIF/STAR commands.

I have not found a DDL reference that explains the difference.

This whole area is messy and inconsistent. These names are not well structured.


Some files have:
  _cell_length_a

This is DDL1. I think you should stick with this


others have:
  _cell.length_a


Does this occur in mmCIF? If so it is using DDL2. I wrote a DDL2 reader some while ago ... I suppose the simplest thing is to expect either.


I have a similar question regarding case sensitivity.

Some files have:
  _atom_site.Cartn_x
others have:
  _atom_site_cartn_x

CIF names are case insensitive. Some of them contain punctuation (e.g. _sintheta/lambda). That makes it difficult to generate code from them.


I would suggest that this is all driven from dictionaries although the variations you mention make it harder.

P.




Please advise.

Miguel





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Peter Murray-Rust Unilever Centre for Molecular Informatics Chemistry Department, Cambridge University Lensfield Road, CAMBRIDGE, CB2 1EW, UK Tel: +44-1223-763069



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to