> I did look at the code a bit and saw some comments about > getAtomSetCount not been implemented. It looks to me like you did,
I think that it is implemented at the wrapper layer, but the individual readers are not implementing it. But maybe I have forgotten ... maybe I implemented all of it. > but > I have a question about why you did it differently than how the other > atomsetCollection fields (like fileHader, collectionName etc.) are > accessed from the SmarterJmolAdapter. You return the value by calling a > get method, as opposed to directly accessing the field. Show we do it > one way or another or do you feel that mixing the approaches up is > fine? Don't know. I don't think it matters that much. If you want to change it then you can. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idU88&alloc_id065&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
