Andreas & I wrote: >> hm. What about providing an Interface for JmolViewer? I guess if there >> would have been one in place, it would have stopped me from getting the >> idea to try accessing data from lower levels... > > Well, the JmolViewer was supposed to be the entry point. But I didn't make > that very clear. > > You have made a very good suggestion. By defining a separate interface in > the api directory (and making the existing JmolViewer an implementation of > that interface) it would be more clear.
Andreas, I have given this some more thought and have spent some time looking at the mechanism to derive an interface. I did not realize how much stuff had accumulated in the JmolViewer :-/ It seems to me that there may be two levels of interface. One is a simple high-level interface for simple integration. The other is a more complex interface that offers more low-level control. Q: Can you tell me which JmolViewer methods your code is currently using? Miguel ----- Open Source Molecular Visualization www.jmol.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: InterSystems CACHE FREE OODBMS DOWNLOAD - A multidimensional database that combines robust object and relational technologies, making it a perfect match for Java, C++,COM, XML, ODBC and JDBC. www.intersystems.com/match8 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
