Am Montag, den 10.10.2005, 14:11 -0400 schrieb Miguel: > Daniel wrote: > > > I disagree. If we follow Nicolas idea of making the browser language the > > default (IMHO most user-friendly) and add the possibility to define a > > special language (IMHO most developer/vendor-friendly) if necessary, we > > IMO need this solution. > > Daniel, > > I am somewhat lost. > > Q: What are you proposing/advocating?
I only spoke about Nicolas mail and his suggestions/ideas/thoughts: [..] | 1) the applet uses the language configured by the user in the browser. | [..] | 2) the applet uses the language chosen by the designer of the webpage [..] IMHO the first should always be the default (and as far as I read, it already is). But there may be situations, where the second possibility is maybe preferred/wanted. Let me give you a short example: a localized HTML-manual for the applet containing example usages of the applet and explanations. In this situation you maybe read (localized) "Use menu item 'foobar' to do something ...". Then it would be useful, if the applet is shown in the language used for the manual. IMHO for both it is more useful, if we provide all languages at once for the highest flexibility. BTW: Could you please change the separator of the mailing lists info from "______[_]*" into the official separator "-- " (minus, minus, space), which is automatically handled by most of the existing MUAs? So it should look [..] -- Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers [..] Regards, Daniel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, discussions, and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
