On Feb 6, 2006, at 5:59 p, Bob Hanson wrote:
Timothy Driscoll wrote:
I know your current change is invisible to the end user, Bob; it
just reminded me that most users do not follow the developers
list, and they should be in the loop on this effort IMO.
I wasn't sure to what extent users should be updated when the
change is only in the commit stage, not the release stage. But I
think you mean, just passing the whole idea of such a change by
users before actually committing?
actually, I was referring to discussions about: the kind of data that
gets passed; the format of such data; how to access it. I'm certain
that among the developers, we could come up with a decent scheme to
replace callbacks - but in this case, I think more cooks don't spoil
the brew. ;-)
tim
--
Timothy Driscoll em: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
molvisions - see. grasp. learn. ph: 919-368-2667
<http://www.molvisions.com/> im: molvisions
usa:virginia:blacksburg tx: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Let each and every cell rejoice! For today we celebrate the first,
glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directive! We
have created, for the first time in all history, a garden of pure
ideology, where each worker may bloom secure from the pests of
contradictory and confusing truths."
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=103432&bid=230486&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
