> For this sort of information (I think all will agree), we should use > simpler synchronous communication with the applet. This is what > getProperty() now does. You make a query; the applet returns a value. > Very straightforword.
Yes ... doing all these things through getProperty makes sense. We should think about the 'external' representation that we have of objects like 'atoms' or 'bonds' ... to try to keep them from exposing too much information. >> I think that you need to educate me on the kinds of things that you are >> thinking of. This would include the kinds of applications. > > I should have an application to show you by the end of the day. OK > Excellent. OK, I just committed that change. In short: > > public String getProperty() methods (2) are now part of Viewer. > > JmolViewer class just abstracts viewer.getProperty() methods instead > of implementing them itself. > > Sound right? Sounds good. Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid3432&bid#0486&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
