>> - performance is still going to be significantly slower than the >> (rather tight) C code of RasMol ... my wild guess is 5 times >> slower. > > Indeed, but Rasmol won't work inside a webbrowser... it's a trade off I > guess... Except the Chime plug-in *is* RasMol. They just took the public-domain RasMol source and stuck it into a plug-in.
So, my comment should have said the "tight C code of RasMol/Chime". Miguel ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
