Peter,
Egon proposed this, so he will need to respond with his ideas. My thoughts are below.
>> > 1. I want to make a CML-less applet version (which is much smaller?) > > What is the actual problem with CML? I think that the only thing Egon is concerned about is size. The applet is now approaching 1Mb in size ... and I suspect somewhere between 250K and 500K of that is for CML support.
> Is it the requirement for the > additional jarfiles? No. I eliminated all the jar files.
Now, all the classes that are needed are bundled into one jar file, making it much easier to install and use.
Agreed.
> If so I have code which will deal with "simpleCML" - i.e. ignores DTDs, > namespaces, entities, CDATA, PIs, etc. (which are most unlikely. I wrote > this for JME and it only takes ca 25 Kb AFAIR. We should probably take a look at this.
I have revisited the JME distrib which is deliberately small. It contains XML parser aelfred.jar at 25KB and CML.jar at 5Kb. I believe that most XML support is possible using Aelfred - you only need Xerces, etc. if you want validation. Aelfred parses all reasonable XML.
But Egon is in a much better position to evaluate it than I am.
P.
------------------------------------------------------- Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo, June 4-6, 2003, Santa Clara The only event dedicated to issues related to Linux enterprise solutions www.enterpriselinuxforum.com
_______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
