> That's fine with me. Miguel, please list the shapes from the following
> list that....
>
>
> .atom,.axes,.backbone,.bonds,.boundbox,.cartoon,.dots,.echo,.frank,.hover,.label,.mesh,.monitor,.ribbon,.rocket,.strands,.trace,.unitcell,.vector
>
> ...can currently be affected by the  "font" command:

I believe the following are currently implemented:

echo, frank, hover, label

The following should be implemented:

axes, monitor, unitcell

> [object-with-text] =
>
> ...can currently be affected by the "background" command:

echo, frank, hover, label


> [object-with-backgound] =
>
> ...can currently be affected by the "color cpk" command:

only atoms

Other objects that take 'color none' which will inherit from the
associated atom are:

backbone, bonds, cartoon, dots, label, mesh, monitor (?), ribbon, rocket,
strands, trace, unitcell, vector

> [structural-object] =
>
>
> Basically what I am doing is being more specific about "shape-tokens" so
> that they can be defined independently for the background, color, and
> font commands.

Within the code, there is a distinction made between the
atom-independent-shapes and the atom-dependent-shapes.

The atom-independent ones really don't have anything to do with particular
atoms.
 axes, echo, frank, unitcell


Miguel



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation
Hackers Unite!  GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event.
GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway
http://2004/guadec.org
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to