Am Mittwoch, den 09.02.2005, 20:43 +0100 schrieb Nicolas Vervelle: > From: "Daniel Leidert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[..] > > > Egon (I think) and I decided to make this change the other way a few weeks > > > ago so that updating docbook-xml-x.y.zip in the doc folder won't need to > > > modify each xml file. > > > > That's an interesting point, I wanted to ask you. Why do you need the > > docbook-xml files/archive with the DTDs inside the source? What is the > > advantage to having the DTDs inside the source? > > I don't know why the archive is here in the first place, it was here before > I came to this project. > But since it was here it was easier to point to the local dtd for > maintenance purpose. > For example, I just replaced the v4.3 of docbook-xml by v4.4 and I don't > have to update the xml files. Indeed, thats a good point. Regards, Daniel ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
