Dmitry Markman wrote:
our applications are not applets and never will be as far as I know
My point is that I really like your idea of making more of these routines "public" so that when the code is configured as an applet I can use it, too. I don't know if in the application the scripts run asyncronously, but I'm guessing they do. I'm pretty sure the applet/nonapplet issue is one of packaging mostly. (Right, Miguel?) There are quite a few functions already that the applet exposes, but most of these are not valuable to people like me who would like to do some of the things you wish you could do, but specifically in the context of a web page. I think I listed some of those get/set wishes in some previous posting.
Bob Hanson
--
Robert M. Hanson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], 507-646-3107
Professor of Chemistry, St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave., Northfield, MN 55057
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
