From: "Daniel Leidert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What about using PHP and not XML/XSL for this special problem? And BTW:

Well, I don't know PHP, and don't know either if you can use PHP on
sourceforge websites.
I can learn, but I was looking for a quick way of doing this ;)

> IMHO it's useless to use XML for the websites. The main part of these
> xml files is written in (X)HTML-like tags and you don't use the
> website-xml package (so you have to write a stylesheet for mainly
> HTML-like XML files). So I can't see any advantage of using XML.

I'm not sure I understand correctly : XML is not used directy for the
website, XML files are just converted with XSL to HTML files during the
build process.
It would mean some work to change the way the website is generated.

> Further, the currently produced HTML code is not valid (I've tested some
> time ago, when I was thinking about a better way of translation).

I changed a few things recently so that the HTML code is cleaner.
I'm not a specialist, but now most of the pages go through
http://www.htmlvalidator.com/lite/ without problem.
(it's the lite version of an HTML validator). There are still existing
problems but they are not detailed by this tool.
If you can tell me what is still invalid HTML, I could correct it :)

Nicolas




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: 2005 Windows Mobile Application Contest
Submit applications for Windows Mobile(tm)-based Pocket PCs or Smartphones
for the chance to win $25,000 and application distribution. Enter today at
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6882&alloc_id=15148&op=click
_______________________________________________
Jmol-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers

Reply via email to