From: "Egon Willighagen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Ok, the combination of SMILES with the command name 'substructure' was > confusing me... SMILES is not really meant for substructure definition... why > don't you implement SMARTS then, which is the substructure equivalent...
I will have to study the SMARTS specification, but I may do this in the future ;) SMILES seemed simpler to implement at first. Nicolas ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
