On Wednesday 18 May 2005 11:19 pm, Miguel wrote: > I have put a lot of work into translucent atoms ... had I realized that it > was going to be so much work I probably would not have started :-)
Sorry for bringing it up :) <snip> > But I am interested in people's opinions in the (normal) case where the > color is inherited. Contrasting to what other users seem to want, I would like to be able to define translucency for bonds and atoms separately... Reason: the original goal why I asked if translucent atoms in Jmol are possible is this screenshot: http://pymol.sourceforge.net/pmimag/800/tether.jpg More or less that is... I had in mind to translucently draw atoms in spacefilled mode, while drawing the bonds solid, resulting in something similar as in this screenshot. If bonds would inherit translucency, this would not be possible. Egon PS. that's my opinion, not a statement of what you should do right now or so... if it's too difficult at this moment, or there are other priorities... ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Oracle Space Sweepstakes Want to be the first software developer in space? Enter now for the Oracle Space Sweepstakes! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7412&alloc_id=16344&op=click _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list Jmol-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
